|
Gallium
arsenide semiconductors
Updated April
30, 2010
Click
here to go to our main page on microwave semiconductor technologies
Click
here to go to our page on antimonide-based compound semiconductors
(ABCS)
Click
here to go to our page on gallium nitride semiconductors
Click
here to go to our page on indium phosphide semiconductors
Click
here to go to our page on silicon semiconductors for microwaves
New for August 2009! We've
split our page on microwave
semiconductor technologies page into multiple pages.
 |
Gallium arsenide
is the orginal microwave semiconductor that helped spawn the
revolution in personal communications that we all take for granted.
But now GaAs is an older gentleman, soon to be content spending
days on the park bench of microwave power amplifiers, watching
gallium nitride take over this end of
the business... |
GaAs MESFET
GaAs PHEMT
GaAs MHEMT
GaAs HBT
GaAs VPIN diode
GaAs MESFET
Gallium arsenide MESFET was the
original answer to "how can we make amplifiers at microwave
frequencies?" The first GaAs MMICs demonstrated in the 1970s.
Including HEMT and HBT technologies, literally billions of dollars
have been spent extending fmax of GaAs products up into 100s of
GHz.
The semi-insulating properties
of GaAs substrates and the 12.9
dielectric constant make it an EXCELLENT media for microstrip or
CPW design. GaAs devices operate reliably up to 150C channel temperature,
although some suppliers will tell you it is good for 175C or even
higher. It is "radiation hard" for space applications.
GaAs substrates are available up to six inches (150 mm) in diameter,
which has been a long development since the first 2-inch wafers
were available in the late 1970s. Sadly, GaAs MESFET MMICs will
NEVER be cheaper than silicon, due to the starting material cost
($100s of dollars). GaAs parts are more fragile than silicon, and
the thermal dissipation factor is not that good. GaAs MESFETs may
be extinct in five years, because it doesn't cost much more to fabricate
PHEMT or MHEMT on GaAs, and these technologies offer higher performance.
| Advantages: |
Disadvantages |
- Mature technology
- Optical gates (usually)
means low cost
- Great microwave substrate
(12.9 Er, low loss tangent, high bulk resistivity)
- Six inch wafers available
- Photonic properties
- 16-20 volt breakdown
possible
- Relatively cheap to
produce (but always more than silicon)
- Channel temperatures
up to 150C possible
|
- Limited to Ku-band or
lower
- Noise figure and power
performance not as good as GaAs PHEMT
- Positive and negative
voltage typically needed (VGS and VDS).
|
Examples
M/A-COM Roanoke foundry (to be
moved in 2010), TriQuint Oregon
GaAs PHEMT
GaAs PHEMT was the second MMIC
technology to be perfected, in the 1990s. Breakdown voltages of
PHEMT up to 16 volts make high-power/high efficiency amps possible,
and noise figure of tenths of a dB at X-band means great LNAs, and
made the DISH network possible, you lucky dogs!
PHEMT stands for pseudomorphic
high electron mobility transistor. "Pseudomorphic" implies
that the semiconductor is not just GaAs, perhaps AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs
or some other secret recipe of 11 herbs and spices. Here's some
further info on the the use of pseudomorphic in this context (sent
in by some M101 fans!)
Actually, "pseudomorphic"
means that the hetero layers are thin enough not to keep their
own crystal lattice structure, but assume the structure (lattice
constants especially) of surrounding material (lots of stress
is involved),
If you look at a two dimensional
cross section of the layer, you'll see that while it assumes the
lattice constant of the bulk structure in the X direction, it
tries to keep its original lattice constant in the vertical direction.
This layer is indeed strained. For a GaAs pHEMT, indium is added
to improve mobility and form a quantum well. Indium wants to growth
the lattice and the typical range for useful thicknesses would
be 10-25% on GaAs. You can also do strain compensation with the
Schottky or cap layer.
The purist nerds of semiconductors
often capitalize "PHEMT" as pHEMT. To them we offer this
advice: get over it, or we will beat you up like we used to do on
the playground, remember?
| Advantages: |
Disadvantages |
- Useful through Q-band,
especially if thinned to 2 mils and individual source vias
are used
- Excellent power and
efficiency (greater than 60% PAE)
- Breakdown 12 volts at
best, typical operate at 5-6 volts
- Channel temperatures
up to 150C possible.
|
- E-beam gates (increases
cost)
- Positive and negative
voltage typically needed (VGS and VDS)
|
Examples:
TriQuint Texas, Northrop, Raytheon
(in general all foundries catering to military products)
GaAs MHEMT
Recent work on metamorphic MHEMT
has made premium InP HEMT performance possible (amps up at 100 GHz)
at the same price as "regular" GaAs PHEMT. You can get
noise figure and fmax equal to indium phosphide by using MHEMT,
if you use a reputable foundry and indium content is high. You can
actually exceed InP RF performance with indium content greater than
55%! The down side to all that indium is reduced operating voltage.
MHEMT stands for metamorphic
high-electron mobility transistor. The channel material is InGaAs.
"Metamorphic" implies that the lattice structure of GaAs
is buffered using epitaxial layers to gradually transform the lattice
constant so it lines up with InGaAs. InGaAs is normally grown on
InP, which is expensive and fragile compared to GaAs. "Metamorphic"
is changing the lattice constant by bond breaking as opposed to
"pseudomorphic" which means just straining the heck out
of it!
| Advantages: |
Disadvantages |
- Extremely low noise
figure
- Incredibly high fmax
(more than 100 GHz)
- Extremely low on-resistance,
makes great switches, but not as good as PIN diodes.
- Channel temperatures
up to 150C possible.
|
- Breakdown voltage much
lower than PHEMT
- Low operating voltage
(1 to 2 volts)
- Positive and negative
voltage typically needed (VGS and VDS)
|
Examples:
BAE, Win Semi
GaAs HBT
The heterojunction bipolar transistor
(HBT) is a new development, and can decrease the cost of GaAs amplifier
products because the emitters are formed optically. GaAs HBT devices
operate vertically, compared to the horizontal operation of FETs.
However, for very high frequency, the emitter size must be made
quite small, and the InGaAs layer is thick and is a thermal insulator,
so these devices tend to run HOT. Typical HBT amps are "gain
blocks", used in the UHF to C-band frequency ranges.
Typical supporters of HBTs will
tell you that wafer yield up to 99% is possible.
| Advantages: |
Disadvantages |
- Single power supply
polarity
- All-optical process
|
- Heat dissipation can
be problem at small emitter size
- Typically, reverse isolation
is not as high as with PHEMT amplifiers, leading to poor
amplifier directivity.
- Collector resistors
are required to stabilize amplifiers. These cut into your
power efficiency.
|
Examples
RFMD
GaAs VPIN
diode
PIN diodes make great switching
elements. Vertical PINs (VPINs) are offered on some MMICs, but this
is truly a niche market. As far as we know, nobody offers VPIN diodes
and amplifier devices such as FETs on the same wafer.
| Advantages: |
Disadvantages |
- The lowest on-resistance
for the least amount of off-capacitance.
- Huge power handling.
|
- Two terminal device
means you must create bias tees to bring in DC control signals.
- Expect DC current up
to 20 mA to create a good RF short circuit.
|
Examples:
M/A-COM (Cobham), TriQuint Texas
|