Gysel power
splitter
Updated March 31,
2011
Click
here to go to our main page on couplers and splitters
New for April 2011! We
continue the analysis of Gysel splitters onto the following two
pages:
Rat-race
versus Gysel splitters
N-way
Gysel splitters
Ulrich Gysel published a IEEE
paper titled "A New N-way Power Divider/Combiner Suitable for
High-Power Applications" in 1975. His solution looks like a
cross between a branchline and a Wilkinson,
but it is also closely related to the rat-race
coupler. It provides in-phase outputs, is configured most commonly
as a five-port (for a two-way split with two terminations) but can
serve as an N-way splitter as well. We will describe a two-way Gysel
on this page.
The Gysel divider is often used
in kilowatt-level power combining, for example, if you want some
redundancy in a 50,000 watt television transmitter you could use
a five-way Gysel combiner with 15,000 watt tubes and be able to
remove one of the tubes for service or replacement without taking
the transmitter off-line. The terminations will need to be oil cooled
to dump all of the wasted power, but that is doable. Gysel dividers
are finding their way into the millimeter-wave spectrum, when gallium
nitride amplifiers are combined in solid-state power amps (SSPAs)
that will compete with vacuum tubes such as TWTs.
New for April 2011! How
do you pronounce "Gysel"? We didn't know, until we contacted
Ulrich! It's simple, it rhymes with "diesel" and the "g"
is the same sound in "good". Got that?
The beauty of the Gysel, compared
to the Wilkinson, is that the isolation resistors become one-ports,
which makes it much easier to realize good thermal performance,
and they are much more forgiving in terms of parasitic phase response
(they don't need to be "zero length").
|

Equal-split
Gysel
|
Gysel didn't provide closed-form
equations for his splitter, he used a CAD program to optimize the
line impedances. That's what we did when we designed one. We didn't
use the transformer Z1 (let it be 50 ohms). The other
three impedance work out to be:
Z2=70.35 ohms
Z3=50 ohms
Z4=25 ohms (other
values are possible, it affects the bandwidth).
The big advantage of the Gysel
power splitter is its power handling. In a Wilkinson splitter, the
resistor is embedded into the network, and must provide a short
phase length for the scheme to work. The terminations in a Gysel
are equal to Z0, and can be high-power loads if power
handling is a requirement (such as in a transmitter). The loads
can be external to the power splitter, any length of Z0
transmission line can be added between the loads and the splitter.
Etched onto a thin-film, there
is no way to measure the resistor in a Wilkinson, because it is
shorted out by the transmission lines around it. The Gysel allows
the two resistors to be measured in parallel, even if they are grounded
to the substrate.
Below is a plot of the insertion
loss from input to the two output ports. The one dB bandwidth is
a remarkable 61.8%, which is more than double the bandwidth of a
simple branchline power
splitter.

Power split of an ideal
-way Gysel power splitter
|
The final plot shows the return
loss at port 1, as well as the isolation between ports 2 and 3.
The return loss bandwidth for 1.5:1 VSWR (-14 dB return loss) is
44.4%. This again beats the simple branchline which provides 20.8%
bandwidth at 1.5:1 VSWR.

Return loss (blue) and
isolation (red) of
ideal two-port Gysel power splitter
|
|