| |
Resistive
power taps
Updated February
19, 2007
Click
here to go to our main page on resistive splitters
|
New for March 2007!
Oh, no! This particular
power tap is unmatched, resistive, and has zero directivity,
why would you want to use that?
Fear not, Mr.
Bill, we haven't seen Sluggo around in ages. But on this
page we'll show you that the resistive tap is an excellent
technique for coupling power, and often has advantages over
all other techniques. The resistive power tap is the answer
to the question "how can I create an extremely compact
-20 dB coupling network with less than 1 dB loss over infinite
bandwidth?"
|
 |
Advantages of the resistive tap
include ultra-wide bandwidth, low insertion loss for low coupling
values. For a 20 dB coupler, your circuit will have a hard time
noticing the loss in the primary path due to the missing power that
is coupled off!
The resistive power tap schematic
is shown below. In this case, we use R1 and R2 to steal power from
the primary path, with the stipulation that port 3 sees an impedance
matched to Z0. Using Ohm's law and some manipulation, R1 can be
expressed in terms of R2 and Z0 as:
R1=(Z02+Z0R2)/(2R2-2Z0)
The expression for R2 in terms
of the voltage coupling factor "CF" from port 1 to port
3 is simply:
R2=Z0/(1-2xCF)
Thus for a -20 dB, 50 ohm coupler,
R1 is 225 ohms and R2 is 62.5 ohms.
We'll post expressions for insertion
loss and return loss soon...

A common mistake that engineers
make is to create a power tap using just R1. Sure, this brings power
to port three, but port 3 will also see a very poor impedance match.
Using a combination of R1 and R2, we can match port 3 to Z0 in all
cases. This puts a lower limit of 25 ohms on R1 (for R2=infinite),
at a maximum coupling of -6.02 dB from port 1 to port 3. At the
other extreme, R1 becomes infinite and R2 is 50 ohms when the coupler
provides perfect isolation of port 3.

Here's a plot of the insertion
loss versus coupling factors. By symmetry, S13=S23, and S11=S22.
Not plotted is S33, because it's a perfect match to Z0.

More to come!
|
|