|
Even
and odd mode impedances
Updated September
13, 2008
Click here
to go to our main page on characteristic impedance
Click here
to go to our page on baluns
Click
here to go to our page on coupled line couplers
This material came from Trev45,
who frequents our message boards. To which we say, Thank you
sir, may we have another!
In preparing this text, I am
acutely aware of being a dwarf climbing onto the shoulders of comparative
giants. Much of the credit must go to Polar Instruments Ltd., who
produced a very informative Application Note AP157 related to high-speed
circuit PCB testing, from which I have shamelessly plagiarized the
diagram.
You might ask why bother to explain
a topic when the answers can be computed by any of a thousand electromagnetic
field simulation software packages?
Well, the short answer is "To
understand the answer, you first need to understand the question."
Impedance is a vector quantity
that expresses the ratio of electromagnetic voltage (or electric
field strength) to current (or magnetic flux density). Imagine the
familiar coaxial transmission line, a center
circular conductor within a circular ground plane. There is a straightforward
analytic formula for the characteristic impedance:
Z0 = (138/ ( R)^0.5)*
Log(D/d)
where d is the inner diameter,
D is the outer diameter, and R
the relative permittivity.
Now imagine a simple balanced
two-wire line. Again, there is a straightforward analytic formula
for the characteristic impedance:
Z0 = (276/ ( R)^0.5
)* Log(2*s/ D)
where s is the spacing and
D is the conductor diameter, is the relative permittivity
Now imagine a transmission line
comprising a balanced twin conductor pair inside a circular conducting
tube, in other words a shielded twisted pair transmission cable.
Is there a straightforward expression for Z0, and anyway,
what is meant by Z0 in this situation? Well, a) there
isn't and b) it's complicated. There are three impedances that characterize
the structure, characteristic impedance, even mode impedance and
odd mode impedance.
Whilst in this case there is
no precise analytic formula that applies to any geometry, such as
circular-cylindrical or strip-line of any ratio of dimensions, there
are approximate formulas that apply to say strip-line or coaxial
cylindrical forms over a restricted range of parameters. A reasonably
accurate formula for screened twisted pair is to apply a small correction
to the balanced line formula to take into account the proximity
of the overall screened ground cylinder. The formula is
Z0 = (276/ ( R)^0.5)
* Log(2*s / D) * ((1 - G2 )/ ( 1 + G2 ))
G being the ratio of center
to center inner conductor spacing to outer diameter
There are two modes of current
flow in an electromagnetic situation such as this: the first is
one flowing down one conductor with a contra-flow current back up
the other conductor caused by displacement current coupling between
the two conductors. This is termed the odd mode or differential
mode current, and has an associated odd mode characteristic impedance,
styled Z0o. Imagine it conceptually like this. Energy
couples from one line into the other, flowing away from the source
to the matched load. No energy returns from the far end matched
loads, but some flows back out towards the source, so there is a
plus arrow going away down one conductor and a minus arrow coming
back out of the other conductor.
The other component of current
flows by displacement current between each center conductor carrying
the same polarity, and the ground that is common between them. Hence
this is called the common or even mode current, and has an associated
even mode characteristic impedance, styled Z0e.


Figure 1 Even and Odd Mode electric field lines
From the electrostatic field
patterns, it is clear that there are 3 values of capacitance involved
for the odd mode, and each must figure in the Z0 formula
somewhere. The first is the direct capacitance to ground of each
trace, the second is the mutual capacitance between the traces,
and the third represents the distortion of each caused by the presence
of the coupled element (and a small contribution due the thickness
of each).
The same argument applies for
the inductance when the magnetic fields are considered, and the
combined system impedance at very high frequencies in a non-dissipative
system is then
Z0 = (L/C)^0.5
where L is the inductance per
meter and C is the capacitance per meter.
Whatever the geometry, the following
holds true
Z0 = ( Z0o*
Z0e)^0.5
which is the characteristic
impedance of the system.
Also, intuitively, from an examination
of the field pattern, the even mode impedance Z0e is
likely to be high because the inductance increases and the capacitance
decreases as the coupling becomes tighter. This because the field
is more concentrated between the center conductors, and less field
exists directed to the common ground
The coupling between the two
conductors is put to good use as the well-known transmission component,
the directional coupler. The amount of coupled energy resulting
from any geometry depends on Z0e and Z0o,
or perhaps those two impedances depend on the coupling. Whichever
way you view it, they are interrelated and the expressions for ¼
wavelength matched lines are:
Z0e =Z0
* ((1 + k)/(1 - k))^0.5
where k = 10^(-0.05*C) and
C = coupling in decibels, and
Z0 is the line characteristic
impedance
Z0o=Z0
* ((1 - k)/(1 + k))^0.5
From these, it is clear that
Z0 = ( Z0o*
Z0e )^0.5
In a 50 ohm system, for weak
coupling, say 30 dB, k = 0.032, and so Z0e should be
around 51.6 ohms and Z0o around 48.42 ohms. Intuitively,
the coupling is weak, so the two impedances are almost identical
to the system impedance, 50 ohms. With weak coupling there is minimal
field distortion relative to the case where only one conductor exists.
For a 3 dB broadside coupler
in a 70.7 ohm section (Z0'), k = 0.707 so Z0e is approximately
170.7 ohms and Z0o is 29.3 ohms. Because the coupling
is tight, these impedances are considerably different from the system
impedance 70.7 ohms.
Trace-widths and spacing in micro-strip
or strip-line can be found in the standard reference works, or even
some day on this site 8-). To be honest, there are almost as many
modeling formulas as there are microwave engineers working in this
field.
Or, now you understand the question,
fire up your software and you will understand the answer.
|