1954 Sears Roebuck mixer that poured the foundation of the Unknown Editor's childhood home in New Jersey

Check out our book recommendation page and order Stephen Maas' masterpiece on mixers!

Here's a clickable index to our growing material on mixers:

Excel S-parameter Mixer (new for January 2021!)

Pocket comb mixer (new for November 2019!)

Mixer history - heterodyning

Mixer noise figure 

Mixer spur chart

Mixer mess!

Mixer waveforms

Single-balanced mixer

Double balanced mixer

Sub-harmonic mixers

Spur search calculator instruction


Image reject mixers

I/Q mixer

Search for RF mixers on EverythingRF.com

Mixer history - heterodyning

Reginald Aubrey Fessenden came up with the idea of mixing signals in 1901, a phenomenon he called "heterodyning". The benefits of a mixer in a radio receiver cannot be obtained without a stable local oscillator, something that Fessenden did not possess. During and directly after the Great War, Major Edwin Armstrong developed the superheterodyne receiver, which would not have been possible without Fessenden's work. Both Fessenden and Armstrong are in the Microwaves Hall of Fame!

This in from OAH in New Jersey, on radios before the superhet...

The original definition for heterodyne was the simple rectification of amplitude-modulated RF to recover the modulation envelope.  The definition of super-heterodyne involved first converting the incoming AM signal to Intermediate Frequency (IF) amplification (through the use of a tracking Local Oscillator) before simple rectification in order to recover the amplitude modulation of the  IF signal.  Super-Het revolutionized the RF receiver industry.  As a kid Eye can remember the old tuned-RF receivers, where you had two or three stages of individually tuned amplifiers (TRF).  When you got your new set there was always an instruction book with it, with instructions as to how to set the individual tuner dials for the popular transmitters in the country........you could periodically pick up the distant stations at night, due to the transmission through the Kennelly-Heavyside layers.  Also there was a blank register sheet in the instruction book to enable you to write down the TRF dial settings in case you accidentally picked up a radio station on your own.  Eye can still see those dials......about 5" in diameter, each with gradations from zero to 100....black in color, with white lettering.

What is a mixer?

What's a mixer? It's a device that performs the task of frequency conversion, by multiplying two signals (why do you think that the schematic symbol for a mixer is an "X"?) Mixers are needed in most microwave systems because the RF signal is way too high to process its information (for example, looking for a Doppler shift in an X-band radar application, you won't find many A/D converters than can handle 10 GHz!)


Schematic symbol for a mixer

A mixer can be as simple as one that uses a single diode, or it can get far more complicated for improved performance. Two broad categories of mixers commonly used in microwave applications are switching mixers and nonlinear mixers. Switching mixers include single-balanced and double-balanced mixers are the most prevalent and have the most predictable performance, but nonlinear mixers allow you to go to much higher frequencies (well into the millimeterwave spectrum). Even in switching mixers you still need a nonlinear device. The nonlinear device within a mixer is most often a Schottky diode, but can also be a FET or other transistor. PIN diodes are never used for mixers, they switch too slowly. (Thanks, Miles!)

Here's a handy video from Christopher Marki with a nice intro to the topic of mixers:

Mixer ports

There are three ports on a mixer,the radio frequency (RF) port, the local oscillator port (LO), and the intermediate frequency port (IF).

The RF port is where the high frequency signal is applied that you want to downconvert it, or where the high-frequency signal is output in an upconverter.

The local oscillator (LO) port is where the "power" for the mixer is injected. In this case, the power that is applied is RF, not DC like it would be in an amplifier. The LO signal is the strongest signal, and is used to turn the diodes on and off in a switching mixer (which is nine out of ten mixers). The switching action effectively reverses the path of the RF to the IF.

The IF port is where the RF signal that was modified by the LO signal is passed, and its waveform is filtered to become the IF signal.

Active versus passive mixers

Even though a fair amount of LO power is used to operate a mixer, a mixer is considered a passive device unless it contains a means of amplifying the converted signal using DC power. One type of active mixer that you might have heard of is a Gilbert cell mixer, which we promise to describe another time!

Downconverters versus upconverters

You can use a mixer to convert a signal down in frequency (as in a receiver) or up in frequency (as in an transmitter or exciter) because it is a reciprocal device.


When two sine waves are beat against each other, you get both sum and difference frequencies. In its simplest form, the math behind a mixer is shown in the following trigonometry identity that you should have learned in college:

sin(Mixers1t) x sin(Mixers2t)=1/2{(cos[(Mixers1-Mixers2)t] - cos[(Mixers1+Mixers2)t]}

Thus a mixer multiplies two signals, which results in sum and difference frequencies. If your RF signal is 10 GHz and your LO is 9 GHz, you will get two output signals, one at 1 GHz and one at 19 GHz. In a receiver design you would discard the 19 GHz signal by means of a simple low-pass structure.

RF frequency versus image frequency

By similar analysis, there are two RF signals that will downconvert to the same IF frequency, which are known as the RF and the "image" frequencies. In the case of 10 GHz RF and 9 GHz LO, the image appears at 8 GHz. The image can cause you all kinds of havoc in a receiver system, for two reasons. First, it is possible that an interfering signal at the image frequency will be mistaken for the "true" signal, and may even saturate your receiver if it is strong enough. And second, noise at the image frequency will add directly to your signal-to-noise ratio, messing up your noise figure, even if you put a low-noise amplifier in front of the mixer. Left untreated, the image often raises the receiver noise figure by 3 dB! Two ways to get rid of the image are to remove it with a filter in front of the mixer, or to use an image rejection mixer.

Double sideband mixer versus image rejection mixers

Ordinarily a mixer will process both sidebands, and its up to you to eliminate the undesired sideband, using a preselector filter. A mixer that processes both sidebands is called a double-sideband mixer, an image rejection mixer is called a single-sideband mixer.

High side mixer versus low-side mixer (HSM/LSM)

In a single-sideband receiver you can process either one of the sidebands. A high-side mixer is one in which the LO is higher in frequency than the RF, a low-side mixer is one in which the LO is lower in frequency.

Conversion loss/gain

This is the difference in amplitude of the available RF signal to the IF signal output (downconverter), or from the IF signal to the RF signal (upconverter). For passive mixers, the conversion gain magnitude is always less than unity, perhaps -5 to -10 dB.

Speaking of conversion loss data in dB, we know that many engineers get all twisted when someone refers to something with loss as having "minus something dB loss", when of course it must have positive loss if it is passive, because the minus sign is implicit in the word loss. People who get hung up on this have underwear that is way too tight. In our opinion, loss can be expressed with or without the minus sign, unless you are submitting an IEEE paper, and then you might want to get it right if you want it accepted.

Mixer isolation measurements

In a perfect mixer, the RF and LO signals would not be present at the IF port, and the LO would not be present at the RF port. There are three important isolations to consider:

RF to IF

LO to IF

LO to RF

The LO in particular presents a problem because it is usually a much stronger signal that the other two. The problem with LO (or RF) at the IF terminal is that these signals may cause other spurious products later in the chain, and perhaps saturate the IF amp if they are strong enough. The problem with LO at the RF port is that it can cause your receiver to radiate RF energy at the antenna port and get you in trouble with the FCC, or worse, get your fighter aircraft spotted by a surface-to-air missile.


The word "spur" is an abbreviation for "spurious signal". These are unwanted products that can creep into your IF bandwidth unless you know what you are doing when you come up with your system's frequency plan, and know the limitations of the type of mixer that you are planning on using. Any nonlinear device, when presented with two or more input frequencies, will output not only the input frequencies but harmonics and intermodulation products of the input frequencies as well. The expression normally used for the mixing products is:

FIF = M x FRF + N x FLO

Basically, there are in infinite number of possibilities that are due to multiples RF and LO frequencies. We have a separate page that covers this topic. And another page on spur charts!

The "pump"

The LO is sometimes called the "pump" signal. Subharmonic mixers are said to be subharmonically pumped. This probably is somehow related to the English referring to tubes as "valves", they seem to be fixated on plumbing references...

Some mixer rules of thumb:

Mixers The one dB compression point of a mixer is typically 6 dB less than the specified LO power.

Mixers Mixer noise figure is roughly equal to the magnitude of its conversion loss, or just a little bit less. For example, a mixer with -6 dB conversion gain might have 5.5 dB noise figure. See this page for on-going explanation (or controversy!)

Mixers You should measure the return loss of a mixer's three ports at the specified LO drive level, or you will see bad results because the diodes won't be turned on. This means that you need to measure the LO return loss at the proper power, which is not usually possible using a network analyzer.

Author : Unknown Editor