Surface Roughness

Click here to go to our page on skin depth

Click here to go to our page on RF sheet resistance

Click here to go to our main page on microstrip

Click here to go to our page on microstrip loss

New for December 2010! We are finally going to tackle this subject. Come back later please, we're still working on this! Check out this unrelated topic, A Rough Justice!

Surface roughness is often the answer to the question "where did all this loss come from?", it can be a problem for thin-film networks and printed wiring boards alike. When we are discussing roughness, it is typically in the context on microstrip circuits. Roughness is a double-edged sword for sure, the rougher the interface between the metal and the substrate, the better the adhesion, but the higher the attenuation.

A common mistake that new engineers make when they first hear about surface roughness increasing conductor loss, is that it's the a problem on the top surface of the metal in microstrip (the surface you can see). But as we all come to know, its the surface that you can't see that matters most.

Let's go out to the Microwaves101 laboratory, and listen in as Wally encounters Pasquale working on his latest design:

Wally: What in tarnation are you doing there, son?

Pasquale: I'm trying to polish the metal on the top of my filter, and the gold is smearing everywhere!

Wally: Where did you get the notion to do something foolish like that?

Pasquale: Well, my X-band filter has twice as much loss as the simulator said it would, and Evita said it was because of surface roughness of the metal, and she's usually right. Funny, the metal didn't look rough under the microscope until I tried to polish it with the brillo pad!

Wally: Well, she's always been right to look at I reckon! Say, where did you get the alumina for that filter?

Pasquale: Eew, don't say that about Evita, she's older than my mom and her jewelry is so clangy! She must be pushing forty! But check out my new ascot... The alumina came from right here, it was a free sample, and it says 93% pure, unpolished. Is that good or what?

Wally: It seems any fool can design a filter these days with that newfangled software. But it seems that this fool can't build one! Let me set you straight... but first, who the Hell is Ed Hardy and why are you wearing his jumpsuit?

Surface roughness has a big effect on metal loss. When roughness becomes on the order of skin depth, attenuation of transmission lines increase. It's semi-predictable, however, there is no exact calculation of the effect, and surface roughness by itself is not easy to quantify into a single number. Although an RMS value is typically used, the geometry of the roughness is rarely regular or random. Indeed, the roughness could give way to anisotropic attenuation, as polishing marks may be more pronounced in the x-axis than the y-axis.

Recall that the surface conductivity (or RF resistivity) of a metal film is a function of frequency, as conduction decreases exponentially from the surface into the film. Let's make a table of the incremental conductivity versus skin depth:

at the surface, conductivity is 100%

at one skin depth, it is decreased to 36.8%

at two skin depths, 13.5%

at three skin depths, 5.0%

at four, 1.8%

at five, 0.7%

So if you have five skin depths of metal, you have pretty much captured all of the conduction you can. Until you mess up the surface.

The roughness of the conductor interferes with conduction. But it isn't as simple as integrating the conductivity of remaining, "non-rough" metal. RF currents seem to find a way up and down the hills and valleys. It's possible is to observe the attenuation of like structures of various roughness (roughni?), and come up with an empirical formula for the increase in attenuation.

The most often quoted reference on increased attenuation in microstrip due to surface roughness is E. O. Hammerstad and F. Bekkadal, A Microstrip Handbook, ELAB Report, STF 44 A74169, University of Trondheim, Norway, 1975, pp 98-110. They provided an empirical formula for the increase in alpha-c (attenuation constant due to conductor loss), for microstrip, that came from curve fitting:


where alpha-c' is the attenuation due to conductivity, after it is increased by roughness, and

delta is the RMS roughness.

It is scary that we have to point this out, but the units for tan-1 should be in radians, not degrees... You'll notice that the equation can only increase alpha-c by a maximum factor of two, even if the roughness is greater than the skin depth.

We don't have that reference (yet!), but we'll guess that this was valid when the total thickness of the metal was many skin depths.

We plotted the function below:

Surface Roughness

And here are some numerical values for those readers that are too lazy to try out the calculation:

Roughness/skin depth alpha-c'/alpha-c
0 1
0.5 1.21
1 1.61
1.5 1.80
2 1.89
2.5 1.93
3 1.95
3.5 1.96
4 1.97
4.5 1.98
5 1.98

Surface RoughnessSurface Roughness Rule of Thumb

When RMS roughness is approximately equal to skin depth, conductor loss is increased by 60%. When roughness is much more than skin depth, conductor loss is 2X what is could be under ideal conditions (100% increase).

Surface roughness of typical substrate materials

Some entries are from Foundations for Microstrip Circuit Design by Terry Edwards, a Wiley book.

Coming soon!


Author : Unknown Editor